Search in the site by keyword

Publications - ISI Article

Is Active Mobility Really a SustainableWay of Travelling inItalian Cities? When and Where Injury Risk Offsets theBenefits of Riding orWalking

Publications - ISI Article

Is Active Mobility Really a SustainableWay of Travelling inItalian Cities? When and Where Injury Risk Offsets theBenefits of Riding orWalking

The study assesses the economic health benefits of switching from private cars to active mobility for urban travel in Italy, considering both positive (increased physical activity) and negative (air pollution and road injury risks) effects. Overall, the health impact is usually negative due to high rates of traffic accidents, but there are positive effects in cities with good bicycle infrastructure for cyclists.

Even though active mobility is considered a sustainable way of travelling in urban environments, this might not always be the case because of a lack of infrastructure and poor road safety standards.

 

This study assesses, under an economic point of view, the health benefits of a shift from private cars to active mobility for urban travels in Italy, considering both mortality and morbidity effects. The overall health effect is the result of positive (increased physical activity) and negative effects (increased air pollutant intake and increased road injury risk).

 

Health impacts are measured using disability-adjusted life years and translated into monetary terms using either the value of a life year or the value of a statistical life. On average, the overall health effect of the modal shift is negative. This is largely due to the very high pedestrian and bike road injury rates in Italian cities.

 

The negative effect of increased air pollution intake is negligible if compared with the effect of road injuries. In the case of bikes/e-bikes, the overall health effect is positive in cities characterised by good cycling infrastructure.

Projects

Comments